MALCHMAN v. DAVIS

No. 888, Docket 82-7759.

706 F.2d 426 (1983)

Nathan MALCHMAN, Gerta Conway, William Deautriell, and Louis Stone, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Leonard DAVIS, Sophie Davis, Colonial Penn Group, Inc., Colonial Penn Franklin Insurance Company, Intramerica Life Insurance Company, National Association Plans, Inc., American Association of Retired Persons, National Retired Teachers Association, Carrie B. Allen, Oranda Bangsberg, Bernard Berggren, June Biggar, Arthur Bouton, Olaf Kaasa, Clara L. Kleweno, Floyd E. Tumbleson, J. Leonard Johnson, C.E. Carmichael, American Association of Retired Persons Insurance Trust, Dorothy M. Crippen, James J. Browning, Lloyd I. Singer, Cyril F. Brickfield, and John J. MacWilliams, Defendants-Appellees, Mountain Plains Congress of Senior Organizations, Mr. and Mrs. Hugh A. Groves, Francis Seely, Estelle Whittle, Henry Whittle, Mr. and Mrs. Burton W. Atkinson, Mr. and Mrs. C.E. Dietrich, Harriet Miller, and Alice Van Landingham, Objectors-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided May 2, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph A. Yablonski, Washington, D.C. (Daniel B. Edelman, Yablonski, Both & Edelman, Washington, D.C., Philip J. Hirschkop, Hirschkop & Grad, P.C., Alexandria, Va., Robert J. Sugarman, Sugarman & Denworth, Philadelphia, Pa.), for objectors-appellants.

Michael Lesch, New York City (Fran M. Jacobs, Shea & Gould, New York City,

Stanley L. Kaufman, Irving Malchman, Kaufman, Malchman & Kirby, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellees.

Sidney Rosdeitcher, Washington, D.C. (Jeffrey C. Slade, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for Colonial Penn Group, Inc., and related defendants-appellees.

Geoffrey M. Kalmus, New York City (Michael S. Oberman, Kramer, Levin, Nessen, Kamin & Soll, New York City, of counsel), for Association defendants-appellees.

Before LUMBARD, OAKES and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges.


OAKES, Circuit Judge:

This appeal is by objectors to the settlement of a class action antitrust suit. The settlement, while giving certain injunctive relief against some of the defendants, also waives any claim for damages for the defendants' past conduct by several million members of the plaintiffs' class(es). Coordinately, the settlement agreement covers a state court lawsuit for breach of fiduciary duty and conflict of interest arising out of the same facts. The...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases