JOOST v. U.S. PAROLE COM'N

No. 82-1793.

698 F.2d 418 (1983)

Robert JOOST, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

January 20, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Joost, pro se.

Before SETH, Chief Judge, and McKAY and LOGAN, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Petitioner seeks review of the denial of his request for a writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2241, by which he sought to challenge the United States Parole Commission's denial of parole...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases