1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON v. MARION COUNTY

No. CA A25075.

668 P.2d 412 (1983)

64 Or.App. 218

1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON, Petitioner, v. MARION COUNTY, Oregon and Land Conservation and Development Commission, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 10, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Stacey, Jr., Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Robert C. Cannon, Marion County Counsel, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent Marion County.

Mary J. Deits, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Land Conservation and Development Commission. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen. and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and WARDEN and YOUNG, JJ.


GILLETTE, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC or the Commission) acknowledging the Marion County Comprehensive Plan to be in compliance with the statewide land use planning goals. For reasons fully explained in a companion case, Marion County v. Federation for Sound Planning, 64 Or.App. 226, 668 P.2d 406

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases