1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 703 F.2d
  5. 703 F.2d 363 (1983)
 

ROYAL DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD. v. N.L.R.B.

Nos. 81-7638, 81-7736.

703 F.2d 363 (1983)

ROYAL DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD., Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided February 22, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Katz, Jeffrey Harris, Honolulu, Hawaii, for petitioner/cross-respondent.

William R. Stewart, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent/cross-petitioner.

Before CHAMBERS and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

In this case, we are confronted with apparently conflicting labor law precedents. The legal issues are significant and require our careful analysis. The case stems from the entry of an order by the National Labor Relations Board (the Board) holding Royal Development Company (Royal) in violation of subsections 8(a)(1), 8(a)(3), and 8(a)(4) of the National Labor Relations Act (the Act), 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1), (3), and (4), for its refusal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases