ROESGEN v. AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORP.

Nos. 83-5692, 83-5693.

719 F.2d 319 (1983)

John R. ROESGEN, Appellant, v. AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORP., Appellee. John P. BRINCKO, Appellant, v. AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORP., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 25, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sue K. McDonnell, Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Edward M. Lazarus, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Before SKOPIL and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges, and MARQUEZ, District Judge.


PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

In this diversity case, appellants John Roesgen and John P. Brincko seek to invalidate a forfeiture provision in the compensation agreement they entered into with American Home Products Corporation (AHP).

Roesgen and Brincko, formerly employed by AHP at its New York headquarters, received contingent stock credits as part of AHP's Management Incentive Plan (MIP). Both men voluntarily left AHP to accept employment with California companies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases