1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. B.R.
  4. 32 B.R.
  5. 32 B.R. 1004 (1983)
 

IN RE CANTRUP

Adv. Nos. 83 J 1394, 83 Mc 1396-83 Mc 1398, 83 J 1399.

32 B.R. 1004 (1983)

In re Hans B. CANTRUP and June Allen Moss Cantrup, Debtors. FORT WORTH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and Illinois/Service Federal Savings and Loan Association, Plaintiff, v. Hans B. CANTRUP and June Allen Moss Cantrup, Debtors, Spencer Schiffer, Chief Operating Officer, Defendants. FORT WORTH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and Farmers and Merchants Bank, Plaintiffs, v. Hans B. CANTRUP and June Allen Moss Cantrup, Debtors, Spencer Schiffer, Chief Operating Officer, Defendants. FORT WORTH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and Peoples Savings Bank of New Britain, Plaintiffs, v. Hans B. CANTRUP and June Allen Moss Cantrup, Debtors, Spencer Schiffer, Chief Operating Officer, Defendants. FORT WORTH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and Hill Country Savings and Loan Bank Association, Plaintiffs, v. Hans B. CANTRUP and June Allen Moss Cantrup, Debtors, Spencer Schiffer, Chief Operating Officer, Defendants. FORT WORTH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and Hill Country Savings and Loan Association, Plaintiffs, v. Hans B. CANTRUP and June Allen Moss Cantrup, Debtors, Spencer Schiffer, Chief Operating Officer, Defendants. FORT WORTH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and Cambridge Savings and Loan Association, Plaintiffs, v. Hans Ban CANTRUP and June Allen Moss Cantrup, Debtors, Spencer Schiffer, Chief Operating Officer, Defendants.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado.

September 9, 1983.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl Eklund, and Hal Lewis, of Smart, Defurio, Brooks & Eklund, Denver, Colo., for plaintiffs.

James Holden, and Elizabeth Greenberg, of Sherman & Howard, Denver, Colo., for defendants.

Before JOHN F. McGRATH and ROLAND J. BRUMBAUGH, Bankruptcy Judges.

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINTS

These matters came on for hearing on August 26, 1983, on the Plaintiffs' Complaints for Relief from Stay. On July 28, 1983, the parties in each case filed a Stipulation which resolved all issues between them save one. The parties agreed that the Plaintiffs' liens on the subject properties exceeded the values of each of the properties, and thus the Defendants have no equities. They also agreed that the Plaintiffs are entitled to adequate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases