McGINNIS v. WENTWORTH CHEVROLET CO.

TC A7903-01192; CA A21447; SC 28834.

668 P.2d 365 (1983)

295 Or. 494

Jerri McGinnis, Respondent On Review, v. WENTWORTH CHEVROLET CO., an Oregon Corporation, Petitioner On Review, and General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided August 16, 1983.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter C. Richter, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition and brief were Randee G. Fenner, and Miller, Nash, Yerke, Wiener & Hager, Portland.

Michael J. Hansen, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the briefs were Gatti & Gatti, P.C., and Thorbeck & Hansen, Salem.


CARSON, Justice.

The question presented is the scope of damages recoverable by a disappointed automobile buyer upon her justifiable revocation of acceptance.

On July 25, 1978, Plaintiff purchased a new 1978 Chevrolet El Camino automobile from Defendant.1 The purchase price was $5,923. Almost immediately after taking possession, Plaintiff began to discover problems with the automobile, ranging from cosmetic defects such as chipping...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases