GORMAN v. SOBLE

Docket No. 57219.

120 Mich. App. 831 (1982)

328 N.W.2d 119

GORMAN v. SOBLE

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided November 2, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weiner, Hauser, Wartell & Roth (by J. Laevin Weiner and Harvey R. Heller), for plaintiffs.

Honigman, Miller, Schwartz & Cohn (by John Sklar) and Cole & Tamsen (Arthur J. Cole, of counsel), for defendant.

Before: N.J. KAUFMAN, P.J., and V.J. BRENNAN and R.L. TAHVONEN, JJ.


R.L. TAHVONEN, J.

In this action for damages, plaintiffs claimed they were induced to enter into a consent judgment by fraud on the part of defendant's decedent, Harold Soble. Following a lengthy non-jury trial, the trial court found for plaintiffs and defendant now appeals as of right.

As is often true in fraud actions, the legal issues before this Court cannot be considered apart from a detailed statement of the factual setting from which they spring. With...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases