ROSS v. SPRINGFIELD SCHOOL DIST. NO. 19

CA 19038; SC 28590.

657 P.2d 188 (1982)

294 Or. 357

Frank W. ROSS, Petitioner On Review, v. SPRINGFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 19, Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided December 30, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Durham, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the brief were Jennifer Friesen and Kulongoski, Heid, Durham & Drummonds, Eugene.

John C. Volmert, Springfield, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief were Merwin C. Logan and Wurtz, Logan & Logan, Springfield.

Oregon School Boards Ass'n filed a brief amicus curiae.


ROBERTS, Justice.

The Board of the Springfield School District dismissed petitioner, a permanent teacher of 19 years' employment with the district, on grounds of inefficiency, immorality and gross unfitness. Petitioner appealed to the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (FDAB) by means of the procedure established in ORS 342.905.

After a hearing the FDAB found the facts relied upon by the school board in its dismissal to be true and that such facts supported the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases