YOSEMITE INS. CO. v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.

No. 12996.

653 P.2d 149 (1982)

YOSEMITE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE and Thomas Kevin Pursel, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

November 3, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Beckley, Singleton, DeLanoy & Jemison, J. Mitchell Cobeaga, and B. Alan McKissick, Las Vegas, for appellant.

Rose, Edwards, Hunt & Pearson, Las Vegas, for respondents.


OPINION

PER CURIAM1:

Appellant Yosemite Insurance Company (hereinafter "Yosemite") contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (hereinafter "State Farm") and applying Yosemite's general policy limits to determine proration of settlement payments.

In 1977 Thomas Pursel, insured by State Farm, was involved in an automobile accident while test driving an automobile...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases