1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 419 So.2d
  5. 419 So.2d 336 (1982)
 

STATE v. NEALY

No. 60980.

419 So.2d 336 (1982)

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Sherman NEALY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida.

September 2, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for petitioner.

Michael H. Tarkoff of Flynn, Rubio & Tarkoff, Miami, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We exercise our discretionary jurisdiction to review the decision below, Nealy v. State, 400 So.2d 95 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), because of direct conflict with decisions of other district courts of appeal.

We hold that the exclusionary rule embodied in article I, section 12, Florida Constitution, is applicable in probation revocation proceedings. State v. Dodd, 419 So.2d 333

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases