CHILTON v. THUM

No. 44269.

631 S.W.2d 74 (1982)

James CHILTON, Respondent, v. Joseph S. THUM and Marles Thum, Appellants.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

March 9, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David P. Senkel, Thurman, Nixon, Smiyh, Howald, Weber & Bowles, Hillsboro, for appellants.

Robert J. Robinson, Festus, for respondent.


REINHARD, Presiding Judge.

Employers, Joseph and Marles Thum, appeal from the circuit court's order sustaining an award to claimant, James Chilton, by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. On appeal employers claim that the evidence does not support the finding that they elected to come under the Workmen's Compensation Act. Chapter 287, RSMo. Supp.1975 (hereinafter the Act).

We review the facts in the light most favorable to Commission's decision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases