1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 32 Cal.3d
  5. 32 Cal.3d 668 (1982)
 

FOLSOM v. BUTTE COUNTY ASSN. OF GOVERNMENTS

Docket No. S.F. 24326.

32 Cal.3d 668 (1982)

652 P.2d 437

186 Cal. Rptr. 589

MARTHA FOLSOM et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. BUTTE COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Supreme Court of California.

October 28, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Daniel V. Blackstock, County Counsel, Delbert Siemsen, Acting County Counsel, Leonard & Lyde and Gerald Hermansen for Defendants and Appellants.

Daniel L. Siegel, Alan Lieberman, Michael R. Bush, Andrew T. Holcombe, Roberta Ranstrom and Martin H. Flam for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

NEWMAN, J.

In a settlement agreement silent as to costs and attorney fees, plaintiffs promised to dismiss their action, with prejudice, on substantial performance of defendants' promise to establish four transit systems. Our central question is whether that agreement operates as a merger and bar of all preexisting claims, depriving the trial court of jurisdiction to award costs and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases