1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 675 F.2d
  5. 675 F.2d 10 (1982)
 

CARTER-WALLACE, INC. v. GILLETTE CO.

Nos. 81-1403, 81-1426.

675 F.2d 10 (1982)

CARTER-WALLACE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The GILLETTE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. CARTER-WALLACE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The GILLETTE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided April 7, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert P. Kenway, with whom George W. Crowley, Edmund R. Pitcher, and Kenway & Jenney, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for Carter-Wallace, Inc.

Robert W. Furlong, with whom Frank P. Porcelli, Gregory A. Madera, and Fish & Richardson, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for The Gillette Co.

Before CAMPBELL and BOWNES, Circuit Judges, WYZANSKI, Senior District Judge.

BOWNES, Circuit Judge.

These appeals arise from a patent infringement action brought by Carter-Wallace, Inc., against The Gillette Company. The patent-in-suit covered the formula for an aerosol antiperspirant underarm spray called ARRID EXTRA DRY (Arrid). After a jury-waived trial, the district court, 531 F.Supp. 840, in a comprehensive well-written opinion found and ruled that Carter-Wallace's patent was invalid for obviousness...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases