1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 134 Ariz.
  5. 134 Ariz. 493 (1982)
 

KNOBLICH v. CITY CT. OF CITY OF TUCSON

No. 2 CA-CIV 4347.

134 Ariz. 493 (1982)

657 P.2d 906

Bryan N. KNOBLICH and Daniel L. Bowerman, Petitioners/Appellants, v. CITY COURT OF the CITY OF TUCSON, Pima County, Arizona, the Honorable Bram J. Goldman, Magistrate, Respondent, and STATE of Arizona, ex rel., Frederick S. DEAN, City Attorney of the City of Tucson, Real Party in Interest, Respondent/Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

October 12, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Martin, Tucson, for petitioner/appellant Knoblich.

Gail F. Jansen, Tucson, for petitioner/appellant Bowerman.

Frederick S. Dean, City Atty. by Susan R. Agrillo, Tucson, for respondent/appellee.

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Judge.

This case has come to us on appeal after the superior court's denial of relief requested by special action. After expressly accepting jurisdiction, the superior court refused to disturb a ruling of the respondent city magistrate allowing into evidence breath test results in separate prosecutions of the appellants/petitioners for violations of A.R.S. § 28-692(A).1

The facts are undisputed. In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases