SHAW v. BOARD OF REVISION OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY

Nos. 81-1091 and 81-1193.

70 Ohio St. 2d 255 (1982)

SHAW, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVISION OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY, APPELLEE. TERRELL ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF REVISION OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 23, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James E. Terrell, for appellants.

Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Jeffrey I. Sherwin, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

Appellants argue that because their properties were valued according to their recent sale prices, resulting in a valuation higher than that of homes in the area not recently sold, the constitutional and statutory provisions requiring taxation by uniform rule have been violated. On authority of our decision in Meyer v. Bd. of Revision (1979), 58 Ohio St.2d 328, we find this argument to be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases