1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 185 N.J.
  5. 185 N.J. Super. 93 (1982)
 

NASTRI v. FRANCIOSI

185 N.J. Super. 93 (1982)

447 A.2d 581

NANENA NASTRI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. RALPH V. FRANCIOSI, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 8, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leslie J. Jandoli argued the cause for appellant (Brown, Connery, Kulp, Wille, Purnell & Greene, attorneys; Roseann S. Oliver on the brief).

Robert J. Brookes argued the cause for respondent (Martin, Crawshaw & Mayfield, attorneys).

Before Judges MICHELS, McELROY and J.H. COLEMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by McELROY, J.A.D.

The record in this matter reveals that in the county from which this medical malpractice case originates the Rule 4:21 panel judge imposes a local rule that prohibits parties from using live testimony of their experts before the Rule 4:21 medical malpractice panel. This prohibition is customarily imposed by the judge in the pretrial order. The single exception...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases