1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 185 N.J.
  5. 185 N.J. Super. 91 (1982)
 

GOTTDIENER v. LUCIANO

185 N.J. Super. 91 (1982)

447 A.2d 580

ALEXANDER GOTTDIENER ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ALFRED J. LUCIANO ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 17, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald R. Kaplan argued the cause for appellant (Wiley, Malehorn & Sirota, attorneys; Robert Goldsmith, of counsel; Donald R. Kaplan, on the brief).

Ernest Prupis argued the cause for respondent (Weltchek, Prupis & Ritz, attorneys).

Before Judges ANTELL and FURMAN.

PER CURIAM.

At issue on this appeal is whether the judge below erred in allowing interest on a judgment only at the rate fixed by R. 4:42-11(a) and in denying the judgment creditor's application for the award of interest on the judgment at the considerably higher mean prime lending rate during the two year and three-month period of appellate review.

R. 4:42-11(a) provides as follows:

Judgments, awards and orders for the payment of money...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases