1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 674 F.2d
  5. 674 F.2d 1227 (1982)
 

AMINOIL U. S. A., INC. v. CAL. STATE, ETC.

No. 80-5516.

674 F.2d 1227 (1982)

AMINOIL U. S. A., INC., a Delaware corporation, and the Signal Bolsa Corporation, a California corporation, Petitioners-Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD, Respondent. Amigos de Bolsa Chica, Inc., Real Party In Interest, Ann McGill Gorsuch, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Real Party In Interest-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided April 2, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victor J. Gold, Frederick A. Fudacz, Nossaman, Krueger & Marsh, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners-appellants.

Martin W. Matzen, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., argued, for real party in interest-appellee; Andrea Sheridan Ordin, U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., Anne S. Almy, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., on brief.

Before WALLACE and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

This case presents a troublesome jurisdictional issue arising in the wake of our decision in Shell Oil Co. v. Train, 585 F.2d 408 (9th Cir. 1978) (Shell). Aminoil U.S.A., Inc. (Aminoil) appeals from the district court's order dismissing its action against Gorsuch, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Administrator), for lack...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases