1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 1 Ohio
  5. 1 Ohio St. 3d 167 (1982)
 

FAYETTEVILLE TEL. CO. v. PUB. UTIL. COMM.

No. 81-1923.

1 Ohio St. 3d 167 (1982)

FAYETTEVILLE TELEPHONE COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 4, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Schneider, Prohaska & Sams, Mr. William H. Schneider, Messrs. Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, Mr. Robert Taft, Jr., and Mr. Daniel J. Hoffheimer, for appellant.

Mr. William J. Brown, attorney general, and Mr. Marvin I. Resnik, for appellee.

HOLMES, J.

This case involves the duty of a telephone company to provide adequate service and the sanctions that the commission may impose upon a company for failure to so provide service.

R.C. 4905.224 imposes upon public utilities the duty to "furnish necessary and adequate service."The commission found that appellant was not providing adequate service;5 therefore, the commission's next question was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases