FRY v. STATE

Nos. 61122, 61123.

639 S.W.2d 463 (1982)

James Francis FRY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. Jimmy Rincon MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel No. 1.

On Rehearing October 6, 1982.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tom S. McCorkle, Dallas, for appellant.

Henry M. Wade, Dist. Atty., Karen Chilton Beverly, C. Wayne Huff and Will Wilson, Jr., Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before ROBERTS, CLINTON and McCORMICK, JJ.


OPINION

ROBERTS, Judge.

These appeals are from convictions for aggravated robbery. These appellants were tried together and each was assessed as punishment confinement for seven years.

The appellants do not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. In their sole ground of error they contend that certain evidence admitted at their trial was the product of an illegal search and seizure. We agree.

The appellants were among four persons accused...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases