1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 177 N.J.
  5. 177 N.J. Super. 605 (1981)
 

SPINDEN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON

177 N.J. Super. 605 (1981)

427 A.2d 597

DORIS SPINDEN AND FRANK SPINDEN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ORTHO PHARMACEUTICAL CORP., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 19, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sheldon A. Weiss argued the cause for appellants (Ballen, Keiser & Denker, attorneys; Arthur E. Ballen on the brief).

Myron J. Bromberg argued the cause for respondents (Porzio & Bromberg, attorneys).

Before Judges MATTHEWS, MORTON I. GREENBERG and ASHBEY.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Doris Spinden and her husband, suing per quod, appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of their case. Plaintiff alleged that she suffered from thrombophlebitis and pulmonary embolism as a result of ingesting birth control pills, Ortho-Novum, manufactured by defendants. Plaintiffs contend that the trial judge erred in holding that defendants' warnings were adequate.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases