SCHWARTZ v. KOZAK


85 A.D.2d 507 (1981)

Samuel M. Schwartz, Respondent, v. Aaron Kozak, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 1, 1981


The case is not clear enough to warrant summary judgment. (Cf. Sillman v Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 3 N.Y.2d 395, 404.) In particular, there is an issue of fact as to the terms of the oral partnership agreement, and as to which, if any, of defendant's extra-accounting activities were to be deemed part of the partnership business in which plaintiff would participate. There are also issues of fact as to whether plaintiff diverted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases