IN RE FURNISHINGS AND EQUIPMENT

No. 80-1032.

66 Ohio St. 2d 427 (1981)

IN RE FURNISHINGS AND EQUIPMENT FOR THE JUDGE, COURTROOM AND PERSONNEL FOR COURTROOM TWO.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 17, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Middleton, Roebke & Rayle and Mr. Max E. Rayle, for appellant.

Messrs. Hayward, Cooper, Straub, Walinski & Cramer, Mr. John F. Hayward and Ms. Jacqueline M. Boney, for appellees.


PAUL W. BROWN, J.

The Court of Appeals held that mandamus is the only proper remedy by which a judge can compel a board of county commissioners to purchase furnishings and equipment necessary for the proper and efficient operation of the court. Such a conclusion is incorrect. This court has repeatedly held that when a board of county commissioners refuses to appropriate funds or provide quarters and equipment reasonably requested by the court, a judge may seek to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases