CATO v. CATO

21389

276 S.C. 41 (1981)

276 S.E.2d 290

Susan D. CATO, Respondent, v. Ruben D. CATO, Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

February 4, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randall M. Chastain, Columbia, and Mary J. Wiesen-Kosinski, Aiken, for appellant.

C. Wesley Smith, Aiken, for respondent.


February 4, 1981.

Per Curiam:

The court below ordered appellant to provide $35 per week to support respondent, his emancipated eighteen (18) year old daughter, until her graduation from high school. Upon examination of the record and briefs submitted on appeal we find that the presiding judge properly imposed the challenged support obligation pursuant to the standards set forth in Risinger v. Risinger, 273 S.C. 36

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases