CITY OF ANAHEIM, CAL. v. DUNCAN

No. 79-3803.

658 F.2d 1326 (1981)

CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, City of Riverside, California, and City of Banning, California, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Charles W. DUNCAN, individually and as Secretary of Energy, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 13, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel I. Davidson, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Robert L. Klarquist, Washington, D. C., Daniel J. McAuliffe, Phoenix, Ariz., argued for defendants-appellees; Richard S. Allemann, Asst. U. S. Atty., Snell & Wilmer, Phoenix, Ariz., on brief.

Before GOODWIN, SKOPIL and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.


GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.

The cities of Anaheim, Banning and Riverside appeal from the summary judgment entered in favor of the appellees, various government officials and agencies and several private utility companies (hereinafter "the utilities"). This is the fourth appeal arising out of the Navajo thermal-generation power plant in Page, Arizona.1 The Navajo plant eventually will supply power

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases