1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 667 F.2d
  5. 667 F.2d 1105 (1981)
 

UNITED STATES v. TRUONG DINH HUNG

Nos. 78-5176, 78-5177, 80-5230 and 80-5231.

667 F.2d 1105 (1981)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Truong Dinh HUNG, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Ronald Louis HUMPHREY, Appellant. National Alliance Against Racist & Political Repression, Amicus Curiae. National Lawyers Guild, Center for Constitutional Rights, U. S. Peace Council, Women's International League for Peace and Freedom, Fund for Open Information and Accountability, Inc., Amici Curiae. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Ronald Louis HUMPHREY, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Truong Dinh HUNG, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided July 14, 1981.

Certiorari Denied January 11, 1982.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Tigar, Washington, D.C. (John Mage, John J. Privitera, Washington, D.C., Marvin D. Miller, Alexandria, Va., on brief), for appellant David Truong.

Warren L. Miller, Stein, Halpert & Miller, Mark W. Foster, Moore & Foster, Roger E. Zuckerman, Zuckerman, Spaeder & Taylor, Washington, D.C., on brief, for appellant Ronald Louis Humphrey.

Justin W. Williams, U. S. Atty., Alexandria, Va. (Sara Criscitelli, Jerome M. Feit, William G. Otis, Robert J. Erickson, Paul J. Brysh, Elliott Schulder, David R. Homer, Ann T. Wallace, Washington, D.C., on brief), for appellee United States.

O. Stephen Paganuzzi, Jr., Marshall Perlin, New York City, on brief, for amici curiae National Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression and other organizations.

Before WINTER, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges.

Certiorari Denied January 11, 1982. See 102 S.Ct. 1004.

PER CURIAM:

In a previous appeal we affirmed the judgments entered on defendants' convictions of espionage and related offenses but remanded the case to the district court for a determination of whether materials tardily produced by the government for inspection by the district court toward the end of the trial should have been produced for inspection by the defendants under the Jencks Act. 18 U.S.C....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases