1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 664 F.2d
  5. 664 F.2d 1105 (1981)
 

PUREX CORP. v. PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.

No. 80-5304.

664 F.2d 1105 (1981)

PUREX CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PROCTER & GAMBLE CO. and Clorox Co., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided December 7, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julian O. von Kalinowski, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Daniel A. Gribbon, Washington, D.C., argued for defendants-appellees; Robert K. Wrede, McCutchen, Black, Verleger & Shea, Los Angeles, Cal., Edward W. Merkel, Jr., Dinsomre, Shohl, Coates & Deupree, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief.

Before CHOY and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge.

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Purex appeals from the judgment entered by the district court in favor of Procter & Gamble and Clorox (hereinafter appellees). We note jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1976). We affirm for the reasons set forth below.

I

INTRODUCTION1

Purex commenced this action in 1967, immediately after the Supreme Court affirmed the Federal Trade Commission's order requiring Procter &...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases