NESBITT v. WOLFKIEL

No. 13671.

625 P.2d 1107 (1981)

102 Idaho 104

Donald B. NESBITT, and Betty L. Nesbitt, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Albert WOLFKIEL and Ruth Wolfkiel, husband and wife, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

March 24, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger L. Williams, of Schiller, Williams & Schiller, Nampa, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Leon R. Weeks, Nampa, for defendants-respondents.


PER CURIAM.

This appeal is a sequel to Nesbitt v. Wolfkiel, 100 Idaho 396, 598 P.2d 1046 (1979). There Donald and Betty Nesbitt, sought damages from Albert and Ruth Wolfkiel for alleged willful trespass upon land purportedly belonging to the Nesbitts. The Wolfkiels denied any trespass, and asserted that they were the owners of the land in question. The trial court held that the Wolfkiels...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases