PER CURIAM.
We have considered the applicability of the Supreme Court's recent holding in Estelle v. Smith, ___ U.S. ___, 101 S.Ct. 1866, 68 L.Ed.2d 359 (1981), to the proceedings below. We conclude that the error if any, in admitting a psychiatrist's report and a transcript of a competency hearing into evidence at the sentencing phase of defendant's trial was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Chapman v. California,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.