1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 651 F.2d
  5. 651 F.2d 651 (1981)
 

BROTH. OF RY. CARMEN, ETC. v. PAC. FRUIT EXP. CO.

No. 80-4002.

651 F.2d 651 (1981)

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY CARMEN OF the UNITED STATES AND CANADA, AFL-CIO, CLC; Brotherhood of Railway Carmen of the United States and Canada, Pacific Fruit Express and Union Pacific Fruit Express Joint Protective Board; Brotherhood of Railway Carmen of the United States and Canada, Local Lodge No. 231, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PACIFIC FRUIT EXPRESS COMPANY and Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided July 20, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Friedman Weitzman & Friedman, P. C., C. Marshall Friedman, Newton G. McCoy, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Robert Bogason, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before MERRILL, HUG and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges.

MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

The Brotherhoods contend that the collective bargaining agreement between the parties of September 25, 1964, was violated by Pacific Fruit Express (PFE), when, in October, 1979, it announced that it was abandoning its heavy repair facilities in Roseville, California, and transferring the service there offered and the workforce providing that service to its facilities in Tucson, Arizona and other locations. Contending that PFE's right to so...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases