1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 274 S.E.2d
  5. 274 S.E.2d 880 (1981)
 

CAUDLE v. RAY

No. 8010SC694.

274 S.E.2d 880 (1981)

Mattie CAUDLE and husband, Lancy Caudle, Sr., Kathryn H. Percell, and husband, Robert L. Percell, James Bullock, Theatrice Bullock, Lonnie Bullock, and W. H. Holding v. Herman RAY.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 17, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shyllon, Shyllon & Ratliff by Mohamed M. Shyllon, Raleigh, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Parker, Sink & Powers by Henry H. Sink, Jr., and Henry H. Sink, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee.

WHICHARD, Judge.

The record contains no exceptions and no assignments of error. Because the scope of review on appeal is limited to "a consideration of those exceptions set out and made the basis of assignments of error in the record," Rule 10(a), Rules of Appellate Procedure, no alleged error is properly before us for review. We have, however, chosen to consider the contentions presented in appellants' brief by exercising the power vested in us by Rule 2, Rules of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases