WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES DIST. COURT

No. 79-3643.

658 F.2d 430 (1981)

Mzell WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Southern District of Ohio, W.D. at Cincinnati, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided August 26, 1981.

As Amended October 5, 1981.

Certiorari Denied December 14, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas G. Cole, Strauss, Troy & Ruehlmann Co., Alan C. Rosser, Cincinnati, Ohio, James C. Hickey, Ewen, MacKenzie & Peden, P.S.C., Louisville, Ky., Barry L. Goldstein, Washington, D. C., William D. Griffiths, Cincinnati, Ohio, Jack Greenberg, Patrick O. Patterson, New York City, for petitioner.

James G. Headley, Frost & Jacobs, Robert A. Dimling, Cincinnati, Ohio, Charles A. Horsky/Kathryn P. Covington & Burling, Broderick, Washington, D. C., and William P. Stallsmith, Jr., Washington, D. C., for Cincinnati, New Orleans Southern R. R.

Susan Buckingham Reilly, EEOC, Washington, D. C., for intervenor-E.E.O.C.

Leonard D. Slutz, Cincinnati, Ohio, for United Transportation Union and UT Local 1190.

Patrick O. Patterson, New York City, for petitioner-Mzell Williams.

Jeffrey S. Berlin, Joyce E. Mayers, Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard & McPherson, Washington, D. C., for respondent Railroad Companies.

Before WEICK and KEITH, Circuit Judges; PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.


Certiorari Denied December 14, 1981. See 102 S.Ct. 980.

KEITH, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Mzell Williams requests that this court issue a writ of mandamus directing the district court below to vacate a "gag" order issued pursuant to a local district court rule. The order prohibits, without prior court approval, communications between petitioner or his counsel and the actual or potential class members in this Title VII race discrimination suit. The petitioner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases