CINCINNATI BELL, INC., v. HINTERLONG

No. 80CV29138.

70 Ohio Misc. 38 (1981)

CINCINNATI BELL, INC., v. HINTERLONG.

Hamilton County Municipal Court.

Decided September 9, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Rich, Pott, Wetherell, Foster and Mr. Orville J. Miller, for plaintiff.

Messrs. Dooley, Heath and Schneider Co., L.P.A., and Mr. Edward P. Brueggeman, for defendant.


HAIR, J.

This matter came before the court on a motion for summary judgment filed by plaintiff, Cincinnati Bell, Inc., pursuant to Civil Rule 56. Civil Rule 56 allows the court to grant summary judgment if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

The court must review all evidence in a light most favorable to the non-moving party and if the court determines that reasonable minds could only...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases