MERLINO v. C. I. R.

No. 80-7591.

660 F.2d 415 (1981)

Ernest L. MERLINO and Lieselotte M. Merlino, Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 30, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest & Lieselotte Merlino, pro se.

John F. Murray, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before BROWNING and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and WEIGEL, District Judge.


PER CURIAM.

The Merlinos claimed a moving expense deduction of $2,901 after retiring and returning to Seattle from Germany. Because they lived in an apartment awaiting completion of a new home, Mr. Merlino did not work for at least 39 weeks in the 12-month period following their arrival. The Commissioner concluded that I.R.C. § 217(c)(2) prohibited the moving expense deduction and assessed a deficiency. The Tax Court upheld the Commissioner's ruling.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases