1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 646 F.2d
  5. 646 F.2d 407 (1981)
 

SUTTON v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO.

No. 79-3345.

646 F.2d 407 (1981)

Lawrence W. SUTTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided May 26, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey S. Pop, Pop & Hahn, Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Paul Grossman, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before ELY and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge.

ELY, Circuit Judge:

Sutton appeals a Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) dismissal of his suit alleging a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.1 He contends that the circumstances under which he accepted an early retirement amounted to a constructive discharge and that the Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) was improperly motivated by Sutton's age in orchestrating his allegedly coerced retirement...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases