Unanimously modified, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, the second cause of action in the complaint reinstated against defendant Holmes, with liability for damages, if any, limited to the sum of $1,116, and otherwise affirmed.
There is a triable issue of fact as to whether defendant Holmes was negligent in the installation and maintenance of the electric security system in plaintiff's premises (see Rediscount Corp. of Amer. v Duke,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.