STATE v. FULTON

No. 99.

263 S.E.2d 608 (1980)

STATE of North Carolina v. Thomas FULTON, Jr.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 5, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by William W. Melvin, Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.

Larry G. Reavis, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant.


HUSKINS, Justice:

The court permitted Officer Everhart, over objection, to state his opinion that the tread design shown in the photograph of the shoe tracks which were found near the Family Grocery and the tread design on the bottom of defendant's tennis shoes were identical. This constitutes his first assignment of error.

Officer Everhart was not qualified as an expert witness in the field of latent evidence identification. He was, however, a trained police...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases