Substantial evidence supports the Board of Regents determination that petitioner, a physician, was guilty of practicing the profession fraudulently (Education Law, § 6509, subd [2]) and of unprofessional conduct (Education Law, § 6509, subd [9]). The record contains evidence from which the board could properly conclude that on three separate occasions within a one-month period, petitioner issued prescriptions in three different fictitious names for tuinal, a controlled...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
