1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 124 Ariz.
  5. 124 Ariz. 510 (1980)
 

COUNTY ATTY., PIMA COUNTY v. KAPLAN

No. 2 CA-CIV 3353.

124 Ariz. 510 (1980)

605 P.2d 912

In the Matter of the Guardianship of MH-515-2-79. COUNTY ATTORNEY, PIMA COUNTY, Petitioner/Appellee, v. Paul O. KAPLAN, Respondent/Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

January 16, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen D. Neely, Pima County Atty., by Howard L. Baldwin, Tucson, for petitioner/appellee.

Law Office of Michael A. Blum, by Michael A. Blum, Tucson, for respondent/appellant.

OPINION

RICHMOND, Judge.

This appeal raises the question of the proper standard of proof in a proceeding to determine if a person is "gravely disabled" within the meaning of A.R.S. § 36-501(11)(a).1 At the conclusion of the evidence on a petition filed pursuant to A.R.S. § 36-523, the court commissioner stated:

This is really a tough case. It's fortunate for the petitioner that we don't have the clear and convincing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases