1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 175 N.J.
  5. 175 N.J. Super. 263 (1980)
 

EDEN v. CONRAIL

175 N.J. Super. 263 (1980)

418 A.2d 278

WILLIAM EDEN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CONRAIL AND ROBERT DORRMAN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 18, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sanford E. Chernin argued the cause for appellant (Chernin & Freeman, attorneys).

John VR. Strong, Jr. argued the cause for respondents (Strong & Strong, attorneys).

Before Judges FRITZ, KOLE and LANE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FRITZ, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff was struck by a train owned by defendant Conrail and operated by that defendant through its engineer, defendant Dorrman. At the trial of his negligence action against these defendants the complaint against Conrail was dismissed at the end of plaintiff's case on the theory that the railroad was insulated from liability by N.J.S.A. 48:12-152. A jury found Dorrman not negligent. Plaintiff's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases