SAULSBURY v. WISMER AND BECKER, INC.

No. 77-2855.

644 F.2d 1251 (1980)

Lura Lee SAULSBURY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WISMER AND BECKER, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 6, 1980.

As Amended May 15, 1981.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied June 9, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary K. Gillespie, Santa Barbara, Cal., argued for plaintiff-appellant; Burton D. Fretz, Washington, D. C., Willard Hastings, Jr., Santa Barbara, Cal., on brief.

J. Michael Phelps, San Francisco, Cal., argued for defendant-appellee; Robert M. Lieber, Alan B. Carlson, J. Michael Phelps, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff & Tichy, San Francisco, Cal., on brief.

Before SNEED and TANG, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.


Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 9, 1981.

TANG, Circuit Judge:

This appeal arises from the district court's grant of summary judgment to defendant Wismer & Becker, Inc. in an action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The district court held that Saulsbury had not timely filed with the appropriate state agency, because she had not filed a verified complaint with the California Fair Employment Practices Commission (FEPC)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases