THOMPSON v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION

No. 78-7871-E; CA 16118.

615 P.2d 1206 (1980)

48 Or.App. 229

In the matter of the Compensation of Earl J. THOMPSON, Claimant, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 15, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Hittle, Salem, waived argument for petitioner-cross-respondent. With him on the brief was Olson, Hittle, Gardner & Evans, Salem.

Paul De Muniz, Salem, argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner. With him on the brief was Garrett, Seideman, Hemann, Robertson & De Muniz, P.C., Salem.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and ROBERTS and CAMPBELL, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

The attorney's fees issue argued to us in this case was not adequately preserved before the Board. We are in agreement with the Board's factual determination.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases