1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 26 Cal.3d
  5. 26 Cal.3d 154 (1980)
 

COUNTY OF INYO v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COM.

Docket No. S.F. 23990.

26 Cal.3d 154 (1980)

604 P.2d 566

161 Cal. Rptr. 172

COUNTY OF INYO, Petitioner, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, Respondent; LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER, Real Party in Interest.

Supreme Court of California.

January 7, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

L.H. Gibbons, District Attorney, Antonio Rossmann and Ann Nutt for Petitioner.

Janice E. Kerr, Hector Anninos and Ellen S. LeVine for Respondent.

Burt Pines, City Attorney, Edward C. Farrell, Chief Assistant City Attorney, and Edward A. Schlotman, Deputy City Attorney, for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

TOBRINER, J.

Petitioner Inyo County seeks review of Public Utilities Commission (hereafter PUC) ruling No. 89576, holding that the PUC lacks jurisdiction over the water rates charged Inyo County and its residents by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (hereafter LADWP), a public utility owned and operated by the City of Los Angeles. The county emphasizes the need for PUC regulation because the county's residents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases