SHAW v. PORTLAND LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING

WCB No. 79-1310; CA 16210.

615 P.2d 1134 (1980)

47 Or.App. 1041

In the matter of the Compensation of Maxine E. SHAW, Claimant, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. PORTLAND LAUNDRY/DRY CLEANING and Employee Benefits Insurance Company, Employer, Respondents-Cross-Petitioners.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 25, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Scheiderich, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner-cross-respondent. On the brief were Robert K. Udziela, Peter O. Hansen and Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, Kahn & O'Leary, Portland.

Margaret H. Leek Leiberan, Portland, argued the cause for respondents-cross-petitioners. With her on the brief was Lang, Klein, Wolf, Smith, Griffith & Hallmark, Portland.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and THORNTON and RICHARDSON, JJ.


SCHWAB, Chief Judge.

The questions in this workers' compensation case are whether claimant is permanently and totally disabled and, if not, whether claimant's partial disability should be compensated by a scheduled or an unscheduled award. The Board found an unscheduled partial disability.

I

We agree with the Workers' Compensation Board that, on the present record, claimant is not permanently and totally...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases