ROSS v. HEYNE

Nos. 80-1318, 80-1394.

638 F.2d 979 (1980)

Magnolia ROSS, Petitioner-Appellee-Appellant, v. Robert HEYNE and Theodore L. Sendak, Respondents-Appellants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

December 10, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Capp, Merrillville, Ind., for Ross.

David L. Steiner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, Ind., for Heyne et al.

Before SPRECHER, Circuit Judge, WISDOM, Senior Circuit Judge, and BAUER, Circuit Judge.


BAUER, Circuit Judge.

After exhausting her state court remedies, petitioner Magnolia Ross filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. She claimed that she was denied due process when the state knowingly used false testimony and that she was denied the effective assistance of counsel. The district court granted Ross' petition on the ground that she had been denied due process, but found that she was not denied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases