PONDER, Judge.
This is a suit in contract for costs of "extras" of a building contract. The trial court found for plaintiff and defendant appealed.
The issues are the validity of the exception of prematurity; sufficiency of the proof of the "extras"; and possibility of double recovery.
We amend and affirm.
Plaintiff, Pete Hirschey, was an assignee of a building contract between defendant, Sherman A. Bernard, and builder, Kenneth Hirschey. In...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.