PUTMAN, P.J.
The defendantappellant, Robert M. Savage, does not contest the sufficiency of the evidence which led to his conviction and concurrent sentences on two counts of trafficking in marijuana, resulting from two buys on two separate days one month apart.
I.
The first assignment of error is that because a police informant bought the marijuana from him, appellant was "entrapped"; and, therefore, his rights to due process of law have been violated...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
