HAYWARD v. HENDERSON

No. 78-1246.

623 F.2d 596 (1980)

Dane R. HAYWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Curtis L. HENDERSON et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 11, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

I. Singh Aulakh, Visalia, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Steven D. McGee, Kimble, MacMichael, Jackson & Upton, Fresno, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before TRASK and SKOPIL, Jr., Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.


BRUCE R. THOMPSON, District Judge.

This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellees on the appellant's claim that, as an employee of a CETA-funded program, 29 U.S.C. §§ 801-992 (Comprehensive Employment & Training Act of 1973), he enjoyed a "property" interest in being afforded notice and the opportunity to be heard before being discharged. See 29 C.F.R. § 98.26 (1976).

Recent cases are uniform...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases