1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 266 S.E.2d
  5. 266 S.E.2d 861 (1980)
 

STUTTS v. DUKE POWER CO.

No. 7926SC1008.

266 S.E.2d 861 (1980)

James F. STUTTS v. DUKE POWER COMPANY, a corporation, and Robert Acree.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 3, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McConnell, Howard, Pruett & Bragg by Ellis M. Bragg and Scott MacGreagor Stevenson, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellant.

William I. Ward, Jr. and W. Edward Poe, Jr., Charlotte, for defendant-appellee Duke Power Company.

Henderson, Henderson & Shuford by Charles J. Henderson and Robert E. Henderson, Charlotte, for defendant-appellee Robert Acree.

HARRY C. MARTIN, Judge.

Plaintiff's principal argument on appeal is that the trial court improperly entered directed verdicts in defendants' favor. After careful review of the record, we conclude that plaintiff's argument is unpersuasive and that the trial court was correct in its decision.

Counsel for plaintiff and defendants stipulated that Duke Power Company moved for directed verdict upon the ground that the claim of plaintiff as to matters prior to 23...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases